HAP 465 NVCC Supporting Arguments Peer Review Worksheet

Peer Review of Assignment 6: Supporting Arguments
Reviewer name:
Author name:
Item
Write a brief narrative (23 sentences) that outlines
your first impression of
this section of the paper.
Indicate what you LIKE
about the writing
(positive/encouraging
feedback).
Does reading this section
of the paper make you
more curious to read
about the opposing
arguments? Why or why
not?
What do you think is the
author’s thesis or main
point? Is there a clear
connection regarding how
these arguments support
that thesis?
Are there parts of the
arguments that are
confusing? Where would
you like more details or
examples to help you see
what the author means?
What parts could use
more explanation or
definitions?
How clear is the writing?
If there are places that
seem wordy or unclear,
how might the author
revise to address those
problems?
Are in-text citations
formatted correctly and
used often enough? Is
each Argument Labeled
correctly, using Level 1
and Level 2 headings?
Overall Comments:
Reviewer Response
Page 1 of 1
Supporting Arguments:
However, proponents of EI counter by highlighting its role in nuanced decision-making. While
data-driven analytics provide a foundation, EI equips leaders to better interpret, contextualize,
and act on such data, especially in situations where human emotions and reactions play a
significant role (Brown & Clarkson, 2022). Furthermore, emotionally intelligent leaders are often
more adept at handling crisis situations, as they can empathize with, calm, and guide their teams
effectively (Roberts, 2021).
Nevertheless, contemporary research provides a robust defense for the significance of EI in
healthcare leadership. Leaders with heightened emotional intelligence consistently demonstrate
an aptitude for fostering positive interpersonal relationships, leading not only to improved team
cohesion but also to reductions in staff turnover and burnout – a prevalent issue in the healthcare
sector (Johnson & Greenberg, 2021). Moreover, from a patient-centric perspective, leaders with
strong EI tend to establish deeper connections with patients. Such relationships amplify patient
trust, resulting in higher satisfaction scores and a notable increase in adherence to medical
regimes (Morrison & Smith, 2020).
There’s also a pertinent economic perspective. Organizations with emotionally intelligent
leadership often see better financial outcomes due to enhanced team productivity, reduced
turnover costs, and a more favorable public image, contributing to a stronger brand presence in
the competitive healthcare market (Fernandez & Rogers, 2023).
Furthermore, there’s an emerging trend focused on nurturing EI in healthcare settings. Recent
endeavors in training programs emphasize the enhancement of emotional intelligence
competencies among healthcare professionals. These initiatives debunk the earlier notion that EI
is an innate trait, immutable to change. Instead, evidence suggests that with appropriate training,
professionals can indeed cultivate and refine their emotional competencies, leading to tangible
benefits in patient care and team dynamics (Reyes & Kim, 2021).

Purchase answer to see full
attachment