[I1] At the surface, there seems to be a deep inconsistency in…
Question Answered step-by-step [I1] At the surface, there seems to be a deep inconsistency in… [I1] At the surface, there seems to be a deep inconsistency in Socrates. [I2] In Crito, when he is justifying his decision not to escape his death sentence, he tells us that one must “endure in silence whatever it [the state] orders you to endure” (51b). [I3] At the same time, in the Apology he tells the court that even if they gave him his freedom on the condition that he stop doing philosophy, he would “not cease to practice philosophy” (29d). [I4] In this paper I’ll show that this contradiction is only an apparent one. [I5] In fact, there are a hierarchy of laws, and Socrates believes that one should always follow the divine law over the human one. [B1] On page 38a, Socrates says “it is impossible for me to keep quiet because that means disobeying the god.” [B2] Here he emphasizes the idea that God has commanded him to go around the state, talking about philosophy with anyone who will listen. [B3] Even in the place where he tells the jury that he will not obey them, he makes this clear by telling the jury that “I will obey the god rather than you, and as long as I draw breath and am able, I shall not cease to practice philosophy” (Apology 29d). [B4] Thus, he thinks that the divine principle takes priority over the human one. [C1] Socrates is not really being inconsistent. [C2] He believes we should obey human law and divine law, but that when they conflict, we should follow the divine. [C3] Many evil things are done in the name of obedience to the law, and Plato points us to a way to avoid this trap. QUESTION 2E. An important aspect of the “Context of and Purpose for Writing” criterion is how well an assignment provides an appropriate response to a prompt (whether it does what the assignment asks them to do). In Sentences I4 and I5, the author gives their thesis statement, stating what their main claim or position will be. How much does this thesis statement actually respond to the assignment prompt on a scale of 1 to 4 (where 4 means “completely responds to the prompt”)? F. The “Content Development” criterion concerns how well a paper “uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to display mastery of the subject”. One important aspect of this is whether the content is relevant, i.e. whether the texts (or other materials) the student uses are relevant to the topic of the paper as well as relevant to the specific prompt/assignment. Focusing only on Sentence B3, how relevant is the content (taken from the Apology) to the assignment prompt on a scale of 1 to 4 (4 being the most relevant)? G. The “Sources and Evidence” criterion concerns how well an author makes use of “high-quality, credible, and relevant sources” to support and develop their own ideas. An important aspect of this is whether the sources an author uses do seem to plausibly support the author’s main claims. In Sentence B3, the author seems to be using a quotation from the Apology to support the next claim that “he [Socrates] thinks that the divine principle takes priority over the human one”. On a scale of 1 to 4 (4 being the most), how much does the quotation from the Apology actually seem to support that claim? Arts & Humanities Philosophy MLS 355 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now