Question 4400

/in /by

Question Answered step-by-step Module 3: Assignment This is a professional paper in which… Module 3: AssignmentThis is a professional paper in which headings, full sentences, paragraphs, correct grammar and punctuation, and correct citation of sources are required.Application of Theory to Research:Find two published, original sources in which researchers used the theory as a framework, and/or the concept of interest to support their research. These articles must have been published within the past 10 years. Discuss how those researchers utilized the theory (and/or the concept of interest) to support their research. Include in the discussion of each study the purpose of the study, how the researchers used the theory in their study, how the researchers used the concept of interest in their study, and how the researchers theoretically and operationally defined the concept of interest.Style & Format:The paper will be written using APA standards. The paper will include a title page (using specified format), 2-3 pages of text, and a reference list. It will be double-spaced, written in 12-point Times New Roman font, and have 1-inch margins. Professional and orderly presentation of ideas (precision, clarity, format, headings, grammar, spelling, & punctuation) with appropriate citation of sources in text and reference list is required. Up to 0.5 points will be deducted for each type of grammar, spelling, punctuation, or format error.Submission Instructions:Only primary sources and empirical research articles are to be used for this assignment.Secondary sources such as, textbooks, literature reviews, systematic reviews, dissertations and concept analyses are NOT to be used. All articles in the application of theory to research section of the paper must be written within the past 10 years.Submit as a Word document.RubricModule 3 Assignment: Application of Theory to ResearchModule 3 Assignment: Application of Theory to ResearchCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Study #1 (USE THE APPROPRIATE DESIGNATION FOR THE STUDY: QUANTITATIVE OR QUALITATIVE) Brief discussion of purpose of the study (5 pts)5 ptsClear, correct discussion of purpose (5 pts)4.5 ptsLimited discussion of purpose (4.5 pts)4 ptsIdentified purpose without discussion (4 pts)3.5 ptsIdentified purpose incorrectly (3.5 pt)0 ptsNo purpose identified (0 pts)5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Study #1 Brief discussion of how the concept of interest was used in their study (20 pts)20 ptsClear, correct discussion of use of concept (20 pts)15 ptsCorrect, limited discussion (15 pts)10 ptsIdentified use without discussion (10 pts)5 ptsIncorrect identification of use of concept (5 pts)0 ptsNo discussion of concept use (0 pts)20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Study #1 QUANTITATIVE research study Brief discussion of how researchers operationally defined the concept of interest (20 pts) OR QUALITATIVE research study Identify the type of guide used for the study (interview, observation, etc.) Brief discussion of the themes derived from the study (20 pts) MIXED METHOD STUDY: graded for either quantitative or qualitative portion of the study20 ptsClear, correct discussion operational definition (20 pts) OR Identified the guide correctly and clear. Correct discussion of the themes (20 pts)15 ptsCorrect, limited discussion of operational definition (15 pts) OR Identified the guide correctly and limited discussion of the themes (15 pts.)10 ptsIdentified definition without discussion (10 pts) OR Identified the guide without discussion of the themes (10 pts)5 ptsIncorrect operational definition (5 pts) OR Incorrect identification of the guide used for the study and omitted discussion of the theme (5 pts)0 ptsNo operational definition (0 pts) OR No guide and no discussion of the themes (0 pts)20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Study #2 (USE THE APPROPRIATE DESIGNATION FOR THE STUDY: QUANTITATIVE OR QUALITATIVE) Brief discussion of purpose of the study (5 pts)5 ptsClear, correct discussion of purpose (5 pts)4.5 ptsLimited discussion of purpose (4.5 pts)4 ptsIdentified purpose without discussion (4 pts)3.5 ptsIdentified purpose incorrectly (3.5 pt)0 ptsNo purpose identified (0 pts)5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Study #2 Brief discussion of how the concept of interest was used in their study (20 pts)20 ptsClear, correct discussion of use of concept (20 pts)15 ptsCorrect, limited discussion (15 pts)10 ptsIdentified use without discussion (10 pts)5 ptsIncorrect identification of use of concept (5 pts)0 ptsNo discussion of concept use (0 pts)20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Study #2 QUANTITATIVE research study Brief discussion of how researchers operationally defined the concept of interest (20 pts) OR QUALITATIVE research study Identify the type of guide used for the study (interview, observation, etc.) Brief discussion of the themes derived from the study (20 pts) MIXED METHOD STUDY: graded for either quantitative or qualitative portion of the study20 ptsClear, correct discussion operational definition (20 pts) OR Identified the guide correctly and clear correct discussion of the themes (20 pts)15 ptsCorrect, limited discussion of operational definition (15 pts) OR Identified the guide correctly and limited discussion of the themes (15 pts)10 ptsIdentified definition without discussion (10 pts) OR Identified the guide without discussion of the themes (10 pts)5 ptsIncorrect operational definition (5 pts) OR Incorrect identification of the guide used for the study and omitted discussion of the themes (5 pts)0 ptsNo operational definition (0 pts) OR No guide and no discussion of the themes (0 pts)20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style & Format (10 pts) Style includes: Professional and orderly presentation of ideas (precision and clarity). Grammar, spelling and punctuation. Minimal use of direct quotes (1-2 max.) Format includes: Proper use of title page (using specified format), spacing, font, margins, and headings. Appropriate citation of sources in text and reference list. A minimum of 2 references are required. Up to 0.5 points will be deducted for each type of grammar, spelling, punctuation, or format error. Up to two points will be deducted for poor headings /insufficient headings/formatting10 pts0-2 types of errors (9-10 pts)8 pts3-4 types of errors (8 pts)7 pts5-6 types of errors (7 pts)6 pts7-8 types of errors (6 pts) Health Science Science Nursing NURS 5327 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now