create individual blog entries that address the relationship between mainstream media and the counterculture. Each
student must post at least two entries for this project: the first,
which must be at least 250 words, should be based on the following
questions; and the second, which must be approximately 50 words, should
respond to the comments of other students in the group. Feel free to
draw from the lectures as well as the listening, reading, and video
assignments, but these posts should reflect your own critical assessment
of the topic–in other words, treat the following question as a prompt
for a stimulating and well-informed discussion.

do you think American hippies and British “freaks” were attracted to
aspects of Indian classical music and Eastern spirituality? From your
perspective, what distinguishes appropriation and exploitation of a
cultural practice in contemporary society?

respond to ONE of these posts in at least 50 words:


One thing we can tell for certain is that American Hippies and
British “freaks” did not necessarily fit in to their own society when
they first appeared. So what they decided to do was to essentially start
their own culture and own identity which drew them to things such as
Indian cultural music and Eastern spirituality. They knew they were set
apart from typical culture and they embraced that and they found
something unique they could call their own in a society that more or
less looked down on them. It gave them a way to express themselves
without anyone else’s approval by appreciating other cultures.

People can argue that it was possible they were appropriating the
Indian/Eastern culture by doing this but I don’t believe that is the
case. In this case I think they were appreciating a culture that was not
their own. To appropriate culture more often than not comes off
insensitive to the culture they are representing. There are many
examples of this such as the Washington Redskins, Cleveland Indians,
Atlanta Braves, and Kansas City Chiefs who all have mascots that
represent different Native American tribes and people in their mascots.
This would be appropriation. Listening to music and diving into a
culture to learn about it and understand it is appreciation and that is
what the American Hippies and British “freaks” were doing when they
decided to more or less abandon their own culture and society. Many
people do not understand the difference when it comes to appropriation
and appreciation but when you do something like name a sports team after
Native Americans when you never were a part or even tried to understand
their culture, then that is appropriation.


my opinion, I believe that American hippies and British “freaks” were
attracted to aspects of Indian classical music and Eastern spirituality
because they felt as if they could not relate to the rest of society and
believed that there were many differences between them. It could have
also been a new way for them to express themselves in customs they were
not able to do before or had been previously exposed to. During this
time in history, psychedelic drugs such as LSD were heavily used. A
reasoning for their attraction to Indian classical music could be that
it made them feel a certain way while on these drugs and created a
pleasant experience. In my opinion, cultural appropriation is when an
individual from one culture takes something from another culture that
comes off as being insensitive. A popular example of this would be an
individual whom is not native American wearing or using something sacred
from another culture such as a Native American headdress. This has
actually happened with the Washington Redskins. This NFL team has been
accused of cultural appropriation because of their mascot, which happens
to be an American Indian wearing a headdress. Lots of situations
regarding cultural appropriation happen on Halloween where individuals
dress up as geishas, Native Americans, gypsies, and more. While people
may claim that they are not doing these things in intent to be
insensitive towards these cultures, it does not change the fact that
they are participating in cultural appropriation, which is a very
sensitive topic for many. On the other hand, when someone is actually
interested in learning more about another culture in hopes of gaining a
better perspective and connection, I consider this to be cultural


The reason why American Hippies and British “freaks” were so
fascinated by Indian classical music was because they wanted to
seperate themselves from the mainstream culture. The appreciation for
Indian classical music came about during the counterculture movement in
the 1960s, when people like George Harrison and Ravi Shankar brought
attention to the culture and music. To the American hippies and British
“freaks,” the sounds and instruments were unheard of, making it unique
and attractive. They were also fascinated by their spirituality, such as
The Beatles, who took a trip to India for spiritual enlightenment.

There is a major difference between cultural appreciation and
cultural appropriation. Cultural appreciation is when an individual is
willing or wanting to learn more about a culture to broaden their
perspective, while cultural appropriation is taking a part of a culture
and using it for your own self interest, whether it be a symbol, article
of clothing, etc. In our society today, I often see cultural
appropriation with celebrities, such as Ariana Grande. She got a tattoo
that was supposed to say “7 Rings,” a title of one of her top hits,
which actually translated to “BBG grill.” She also sold merchandise like
sweatshirts that said “Thank You” in Japanese, which have been taken
down from her website due to cultural appropriation. I myself am
Japanese, and I always found it strange that Americans would get tattoos
in Kanji without knowing the proper translation or understanding of the
language in order to get a “cool” and “exotic” looking tattoo. However,
a person who appreciates the culture and understands the language
having a tattoo in Kanji would be appropriate.


think American hippies and British Freaks were attracted to aspects of
Indian classical music and Eastern spirituality because it was a way for
them to be different than the mainstream music at the time. I think
that being a part of the start of a new movement is something that
people find very interesting. For example, being at the forefront of a
new clothing trend is something that many people take pride in. I have
seen this in the past with shoes. One of my friends bought a pair of PF
Flyers, and soon after it seemed many of my other friends also
purchased the shoe. This came with the argument of who started the
my perspective, I think appropriation and exploitation of a cultural
practice in contemporary society is distinguished by the context in
which people refer to the culture. For example, I think that a football
team using a derogatory term for Native Americans as their mascot is a
form of appropriation. However,
I believe that if someone were to visit a Native American reservoir in
hopes of learning the practices of the culture, it is not appropriation,
but rather an appreciation for the culture. Another example of
is using other people’s religious beliefs as a form of style. I know
many people think getting Tribal tattoos are “trendy” and “cool” but I
see this as a way of making fun of their culture. If someone who
actually practices the Tribal religion gets the tattoo, I do not believe
that is appropriation.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now