Week 4-Discussion posts

Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource. Must include in-text citations. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate.

Supporting material: Attached

Question #1:

Is Google right to refuse to issue guidance? Why/why not? (choose one side and defend your position)

Question #2:

In reviewing the multimedia recording of activists and comments on activist activities at shareholder meetings, what is your position on the productiveness of these activists’ initiatives? Do they help or hurt the corporation? (pick only one position and defend it). Use links below!

• Potter, W. (2014, March). The shocking move to criminalize nonviolent protest. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/will_potter_the_shocking_move_to_criminalize_non_violent_protest
• CNBC. (2014, May 22). Occupy shareholder meeting. Retrieved from http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000278136
• Democracy Now. (2011, April 14). Gulf coast fisherwoman “disrupts the peace” at BP shareholder meeting. Retrieved from http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2011/4/14/gulf_coast_fisherwoman_disrups_the_peace_at_bp_shareholder_meeting
• RespectRide. (2013, June 10). Kalpona Akter at Walmart’s annual shareholder meeting. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcC-yCyF4fo

Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 5-6 paragraphs long and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.

Case Discussion Rubric (2016)