Consider your dissertation research interests. Identify one categorical/nominal
scale IV with more than 2 categories, and three DVs that are measured
on continuous scales. Think of DV measures that probably are moderately
correlated with each other because they are measuring different
components of the same or similar concepts (e.g., three different
measures of academic performance). State the null and alternative
hypotheses based on this design (with a planned analysis using a one-way
MANOVA). (Research support is not required for this question.)

The following are the results of Pat’s psychological tests.

NEO-PI-R(a personality model developed from Costa & McCrae’s Five Factor Model in which a 55 and above is a high score, 45–54 is average, and 44 and below is low).

Neuroticism = 75
Extraversion = 32
Openness = 35
Agreeableness = 41
Conscientiousness = 50

MMPI-2 (an atheoretical test of personality for clinical populations in which 65 is clinically elevated)

Validity Scales: No threats to validity.

Hypochondriasis: 55
Depression: 61
Hysteria: 57
Psychopathic Deviate: 45
Masculinity/Femininity:  32
Paranoia: 68
Psychastenia: 40
Schizophrenia: 75
Hypomania: 51
Social Introversion: 68

Last week, you noticed that Pat’s results on the MMPI-2 included elevated scores on the scales for paranoia and schizophrenia. Previously, she refused to discuss prior hospitalizations and health. However, this week she is ready to talk:

“Well, I guess we are not strangers anymore. I told you before I was in the hospital and the last time was when I was 31. I was not in there for body aches. I was there because people thought I was crazy. I’m a bit better now because I am in treatment. I have my moments when things are really bad. For example, I would hear voices—sometimes I thought it was God, and I could hear Him just like I hear you. Other times I would have the television turned off but it would be talking to me anyway. I even started thinking my neighbors were poisoning my tap water, so I stopped showering and drinking. I got hospitalized because I was sure that God and my neighbors were working together to hurt me so they could put me in prison.”

Pat stops a moment to catch her breath, and you notice that her arms are twitching a little. As you think back, you realize she has done that a lot since you have been getting to know her. “Like I said, I only get that bad once in a while when I am not on my medication. However, I still sometimes hear things that aren’t there or worry that people are out to get me even with the treatment. It’s just less.”

For this assignment, focus on the social-cultural factors that affect Pat’s behavior.

To prepare for this Assignment:

• Imagine you are an intern at a clinic that has been asked to prepare a PowerPoint presentation about Pat’s case.
• Consider how Pat’s social-cultural factors affect her diagnosis and treatment for paranoid schizophrenia.

Submit by Day 7 a PowerPoint presentation of 2–3 slides explaining Pat’s diagnosis from a biopsychosocial perspective. p

PLEASE MAKE SURE TO MEET REQUIREMENT AND TO KNOW WELL ASSIGNMENT , IF NOT I WILL NOT PAY.

• MAIN POST

This week, you will be going to the Keiser e-Library to gather research for your argumentative research paper. When you find articles, what will you do with them? You will take these and begin crafting a formal proposal as well, where you demonstrate you have done research on the topic you picked.

For this discussion, choose one of the following two readings:

• Option 1 – Adler, M. J. (2014). How to mark a book. In G.H. Muller (Ed.), The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues Across the Disciplines pp. 16-21. New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • p. 21, “Writing,” Question 3: Writing an Argument: Argue for or against the proposition that this essay has lost its relevance owing to the introduction of new forms of educational media.
  • Be sure to quote and cite Adler when writing your response.
• Option 2 – Carr, N. (2014). Does the internet make you smarter or dumber? In G.H. Muller (Ed.), The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues Across the Disciplines pp. 21-25. New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • p. 25, “Writing,” Question 3; Writing an Argument: Agree or disagree with Carr’s claim that people “who read texts studded with links … comprehend less than those who read traditional linear texts.”
  • Be sure to quote and cite Carr when writing your response.

First, read the article carefully. Answer the question associated with the reading. (100+ words)

Second, we want you to do more than just answer a question. Think about what the author is suggesting you do in your research. How will you apply these ideas to the research you gather, including the assigned essay, academic research from the database, and general research from the internet? (100+ words)

Third and finally, review the three versions of proposals for writing. Explore the merits of each type of proposal. Identify which version you believe would most support your intended major writing assignment for this course and why. (100+ words)

PEER REPLIES

• In 100-150 words, respond to two peers’ main posts. Examine whether each post clearly supports the peer’s ideas about the merits of each proposal and the choice of proposal format for the intended major writing assignment. Offer your ideas as to other ways of seeing the value in one or more of the proposed proposal formats.

REQUIREMENTS

• Main post is due by Wednesday at 11:59 PM Eastern. No credit will be awarded for late posts without instructor approval.
• Peer post should be posted on a different day from the main post and no later than Sunday at 11:59 PM Eastern.
• Use objective point of view only rather than subjective. (See page G-8 for an explanation.)

Select one of the following disorders:

• Depressive disorder
• Generalized anxiety disorder
• Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
• Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Create a Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you compare and contrast the major approaches to clinical psychology—psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, and family systems—in relation to the selected disorder. Address the following items:

• Discuss the philosophical origins of each approach.
• Identify the goals of each approach.
• Describe the techniques and strategies used by each approach.
• Explain how each approach affects the treatment strategies for your selected disorder.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of each approach, in relation to your selected disorder, based on treatment outcome research.

Include speaker notes with your presentation.

Incorporate information from at least five peer-reviewed publications.

Cite each outside source on a slide titled References.

Include a minimum of 15 slides (including Title/References Pages)

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Topic 7: Groups and Aggression

12 Angry Men

For this assignment, you will need to watch the film, 12 Angry Men (1957, Orion-Nova Productions). The film brings to life many of the concepts covered in class to date.

Below, please provide specific examples from the film to support your ideas/claims. Integrate at least two sources: One from the book and one from the film. Be sure to include proper APA citations within your document and at the end (reference section).

Note: Most of this information can be pulled from your textbook. You may type directly into this worksheet. Each answer must be substantial and include some detail if you want to earn full credit. Be sure to define the concepts.

1. Define patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social influences. Provide specific examples witnessed in the film.

Persuasion:

Conformity:

Minority Influence:

Other social influences:

2. First define the terms stereotypes and prejudice. Next, analyze issues of stereotypes and prejudice observed while watching the jurors deliberate in the film. There are many to choose from!

Stereotypes:

Prejudice:

Example 1:

Example 2:

Example 3:

Example 4:

3. In psychology, heuristics are simple, efficient rules which people often use to form judgments and make decisions. They are mental shortcuts that usually involve focusing on one aspect of a complex problem and ignoring others. Provide an example of three cognitive heuristics represented in the film and label them (e.g. availability, false consensus, social proof). Next, define the three heuristics that you selected. Explain where/how the three heuristics occurred in the film.

Define the three cognitive heuristics that you selected:

Example Heuristic 1:

Example Heuristic 2:

Example Heuristic 3:

4. Define the term catalyst for change. Next, interpret the catalyst for change that resulted in the outcome of the film, based on your perceptions. How does this line up with some of the research in social psychology?

5. Define groupthink and group polarization. Next, explain how the film demonstrated groupthink and group polarization.

Define Group Think:

Define Group Polarization:

Examples from the film illustrating groupthink and group polarization:

References