Write an essay in MLA format about Roman fever, by Edith Wharton, and the critique given. Also come up with a title that defines the two texts. Come up with a well-detailed thesis using the short story and the critique.

Please find the thesis. Thesis has to be proven, just find evidence in the critique and book by using quotes!!

Remember find the thesis!

In paragraph one please do the following: Summarize the short story Roman fever, by Edith Wharton and then mention the critique,(Provide one to two sentences about the critique). And then in the last sentence of the introduction provide the thesis.

For the body paragraphs prove the thesis in the two texts!, Prove what the thesis is. Use quotes from the two texts to back up your thesis and to support the thesis.

conclusion: Should be a summary of what you mentioned in the introduction and the thesis, do not add anything new and do not repeat yourself!

DO NOT compare or contrast, ANALYZE the two texts

Paper has to be in MLA format

Has to be well written no choppy sentences, has to flow. Please use transition words.

DO NOT PLAGIARIZE

well structured paragraphs 12pt font double space 3 pages!!!

you can find the short story roman fever Edith Wharton on line

I will provide the critique

I’m looking for someone who does not use Chegg or Coursehero or
any online cites to provide your answers. The professor checks these other
sites as well. If do do this to provide your answers and dont use your own, let
me know immedietly so I can choose someone else to assist me. I have been
notified that an assignment was linked to chegg or coursehero ect?

Use your own words so nothing can be found on the internet.

I have word document attached with the instructions.

If you decide to take this project.

Verify you can open the link to the online book.

Then let me know.

Thanks you.

Please read: Discovering Psychology, Sixth Edition with DSM5 Update by Hockenbury Chapter 13&14, See the “Course Structure and Expectations” file in the Getting Started module for more detailed instructions.

1.

Seperate each assignment

400 word response, identify what techniques you can implement to improve the likelihood that your communications will be received and understood as you intended. Can you identify and reduce the likelihood of barriers interfering with the communication? Give examples. Use at least one resource to support your key points.

———————————————————————————————————————————————-

400 word response, critically examine your personal level of intercultural communication competence. Is it important for you to achieve a certain level of intercultural communication competence? Would enhanced intercultural communication competence help you personally? Professionally? Academically? Include examples in your submission and use at least one resource to support your key points.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

International and Intercultural Communication

After reviewing section 2.4 of the text titled International and Intercultural Interpersonal Communication, visit The Hofstede Centre (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/) and continue to explore national cultural dimensions. Here you will choose two countries to compare and contrast in terms of cultural dimensions.

Develop a two-page, APA-formatted paper that addresses the following:

• Describe how the two countries are similar in terms of Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions.
• Describe how the two countries are different in terms of Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions.
• Given a scenario where two organizations, one located in each country, are to do business with each other, provide recommendations that would be beneficial in helping management address communications in terms of the different cultural perspectives. Your paper must be two pages (not including title and reference pages) and must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

Between the earlier literature and the work of the eighteenth century it is clear that the letter and the sermon are two distinct genres of early American writing. The letter establishes an intimacy between the writer and the reader, while the sermon (and we can view Thomas Paine’s work as a sermon, of a sort, and certainly the work of David Walker) is meant to bring a large population into a shared communal experience.

Consider the pieces included in “Letters between John and Abigail Adams” and then the sermon-like works of Paine and Walker. Find specific phrases the authors are using to establish trust with their intended audience. How do these passages help establish a connection?

Next, it is recognized in the introduction to Benjamin Franklin’s work that he “is, on the one hand, the embodiment of the Age of Reason, and yet, on the other hand, he is decidedly modern, a masterfully agile performer of parts who (in the words of one critic) ‘envisaged the process of what might be called self-creation as the conscious playing of a series of calculated roles’” (293). The Autobiography is also widely recognized as the first great American prose narrative.

One of the elements of the work’s greatness is exemplified by specific storytelling techniques. Of these techniques, we see Franklin organizes his writing partially in the letter-form. Consider the tone of The Autobiography and the thoughts in “Benjamin Franklin Slept Here.” What does omission of certain details do to the story itself? Does it make it less true? Why or why not?
Finally, in your opinion, which of the three forms studied in this discussion post (letters, sermons, autobiographical narratives) is the most effective and why?